Second Stories : The Politics of Language, Form, and Gender in Early American Fictions (Gender and American Culture)

Second Stories offers an innovative reexamination of selected texts by major figures in American literature: Benjamin Franklin, Hugh Henry Brackenridge, and Charles Brockden Bown from the early national period, and James Fenimore Cooper, Edgar Alan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Herman Melville from the romantic period. Combining close reading with a powerful ideological argument, Cynthia Jordan demonstrates that a concern with the patriarchal politics of language informs both the thematic content and the overall shape of much of the fiction of these writers. The issue of gender, Jordan shows, is central to these authors' works, and her study deftly reveals the gender-related value judgments that their language implies. Jordan begins by arguing that the American Revolution ushered in a new type of patriarchy founded on the communally sanctioned authority of a white male elite educated to provide political guidance and guardianship. In their narrative fictions, Franklin, Brackenridge, and Brown promoted the new patriarchal social order by writing in the language of fathers and father figures. As Jordan shows, however, in each author's work the surface narrative becomes increasingly threatened by a second story, introduced to give validity to but also challenging the paternalisit worldview embraced by the first story and offering a commpelling alternative to it. Rejecting the patriachal language and repressive model of masculinity bequeathed to them by their predecessors, Cooper, Poe, Hawthorne, and Melville validated the second story of American culture, while often disguising it beneath a conventional fiction. This second story is most frequently presented as the story of a woman or women representing both the sociopolitically oppressed ""other"" in American society and those aspects of human nature devalued by the male consciousness. Through this new story, the romantics present an alternative to what they view as patriarchy's ethically depleted language and a corre